Ezra "Penny" Baxter is the protagonist of the novel "In the Eye of an Actor". The story is set in the American South during the late 1800s. It tells the tale of Penny’s journey from a young, penniless boy to a successful, world-renowned actor.
The novel was adapted into a movie in 2009. The movie was directed by Robert Redford and starred James Franco as Penny Baxter.
There are many differences between the novel and the movie. Among the most evident is the relationship between Penny and his father. In the novel, it is only at the end of the story when Ezra "Penny" Baxter grows closer to his son. However, in the movie, their relationship is much more loving and supportive from the beginning.
Another significant difference is in Penny’s speech. In the novel, Penny speaks with a thick southern accent. This is in contrast to his proper, well-spoken English in the movie. This change was made to make Penny more relatable to a modern audience.
Lastly, the emotions that Penny experiences are also different between the two versions of the story. In the novel, Penny is often angry and resentful. However, in the movie, he is more optimistic and hopeful.
2. Different versions of the same story
It is interesting to compare and contrast how different mediums can change a story. When a story is told through written word, it can be interpreted in many ways by the reader. However, when that same story is told through visuals, there is less room for interpretation by the viewer.
For example, in "In the Eye of an Actor", there are several scenes where Penny is very emotional. In one scene, he cries after his father dies. In another scene, he screams in anger after he finds out that his mother has been cheating on his father.
These emotional scenes are portrayed differently in the book and the movie. In the book, they are described through Penny’s thoughts and dialogue. The reader is able to feel empathy for Penny because they can understand his thoughts and feelings.
However, in the movie, these same scenes are conveyed through visual cues and Franco’s performance alone. Franco does an excellent job of conveying Penny’s emotions visually without relying on dialogue or inner thoughts. As a result, viewers are still able to feel empathy for Penny, but in a different way than readers of the book do.
3 How does stage performance of an actor differ from screen performance of an actor?
When you watch a play, you are seeing a live performance by actors on a stage. When you watch a movie or television show, you are seeing a recorded performance by actors on a screen. Though both types of performances involve acting, there are some key differences between them.
Firstly, stage performances are usually seen by audiences in person, while screen performances can be seen by audiences anywhere in the world via television or internet streaming services. Because of this difference in how audiences consume stage and screen performances, actors must approach their craft differently. When performing on stage, actors must be aware of their audience and perform for them in the moment. They must also be aware of their own energy and how it is affecting the audience. On the other hand, when performing for a camera, actors must be aware of the camera and how their performance will be edited and presented to the audience later.
Secondly, stage performances are usually much longer than screen performances. A typical stage play lasts two to three hours, while a movie typically lasts around two hours. This difference in runtime means that actors must have the stamina to maintain their performance for a longer period of time when on stage. They must also be able to memorize their lines for the entire play, as there are usually no second takes in live theatre. In contrast, screen performances are typically broken up into shorter scenes that are filmed out of order. This allows actors to memorize their lines for only one scene at a time, and also gives them the opportunity to do multiple takes of each scene until they get it right.
Lastly, stage performances are usually seen by audiences in a large theatre or hall, while screen performances are usually seen by audiences on a smaller scale, such as on a television or computer screen. This difference in scale means that stage performers must project their voices and movements to reach the back row of the theatre, while screen performers must be more subdued in their delivery so that they do not appear overdone on camera.
In conclusion, there are many differences between stage and screen acting. These differences include the relationship between the actor and the audience, the length of the performance, and the scale of the performance. Though both types of acting require talent and skill, they are distinct crafts that require different approaches.